Headlines like that are stupid because no one knows that it’s going to be that exact percentage of a sell-off. So 67% is just dumb for them to say.
NOW, with that said…one previous market crash was around 40% and another was around 60%. So is that possible? Absolutely. And yes, when markets have soared like they have…hardly anyone thinks sell-offs are possible. But how they think and feel about it has absolutely no bearing on what’s possible and very likely.
What was said in the headline might be stupid, but I don’t think your post is Scott.
The more information I am exposed to the more I learn from what is subsequently discussed.
and sometimes I need to see/read the same things to keep me grounded in the LI process.
Like this one, once again it is reiterated for me not to invest in any funds that follow the market or “popular” stocks, while some people I know personally keep throwing money at them.
and FusionDude, as a wise man once told me – “figures don’t lie but liars figure” 🙂
Scott, no need to apologize. I think the content was great. I was criticizing the odd/exact numbers that are just ploys for eyeballs from marketers. You did nothing wrong. Thanks for sharing the info.
Yeah, you did just fine. You did nothing wrong. The dumb part was the headline that they chose to write. It’s a marketing/copywriting technique to grab extra eyeballs.